Embark on an incisive journey through the tumultuous landscape of political and legal entanglements that define an election year. In our latest episode, we unravel the closed-door testimony of Hunter Biden and scrutinize the credibility of GOP witnesses stirring the pot of national discourse. As we lay bare the complex defenses and allegations of corruption, the episode offers a unique perspective on the nepotism debate and its implications for our governance and ethical standards. Prepare to be immersed in a narrative that not only informs but challenges the status quo, as we navigate the brackish waters of partisan clashes and their far-reaching consequences.
The episode's narrative takes an unexpected dive into the financial depths, sifting through the muck of capital gains tax and the repercussions of delayed trials—strategies that could reshape the political terrain. Our focus intensifies as we contemplate the urgency of indicting co-conspirators tied to the Capitol insurrection. The clock is ticking towards the elections, and with meticulous analysis, we shed light on the potential influence of judicial strategies looming over the democratic process. This episode isn't just a discussion; it's a clarion call for accountability, as we dissect the importance of a speaking indictment and its impact on the electorate's knowledge. Join us, and be part of a conversation that seeks to fortify the pillars of our democracy with unwavering dedication to truth and justice.
Embark on an incisive journey through the tumultuous landscape of political and legal entanglements that define an election year. In our latest episode, we unravel the closed-door testimony of Hunter Biden and scrutinize the credibility of GOP witnesses stirring the pot of national discourse. As we lay bare the complex defenses and allegations of corruption, the episode offers a unique perspective on the nepotism debate and its implications for our governance and ethical standards. Prepare to be immersed in a narrative that not only informs but challenges the status quo, as we navigate the brackish waters of partisan clashes and their far-reaching consequences.
The episode's narrative takes an unexpected dive into the financial depths, sifting through the muck of capital gains tax and the repercussions of delayed trials—strategies that could reshape the political terrain. Our focus intensifies as we contemplate the urgency of indicting co-conspirators tied to the Capitol insurrection. The clock is ticking towards the elections, and with meticulous analysis, we shed light on the potential influence of judicial strategies looming over the democratic process. This episode isn't just a discussion; it's a clarion call for accountability, as we dissect the importance of a speaking indictment and its impact on the electorate's knowledge. Join us, and be part of a conversation that seeks to fortify the pillars of our democracy with unwavering dedication to truth and justice.
Yo, what up? This is D-Night and you're listening to the part of the Insurrection podcast. We are back with the pocket part and episode for you. Of course, it's been non-stop insanity, as it tends to be every single goddamn day. I don't know, like I'm not entirely certain, I can keep this up through the entirety of an election year, at the rate things are going, because it's just off the rails. But of course, before we get to all of that, let's give a shout out to our sponsor, sheetsandgiggles.
Speaker 1:
I want you to pick up a set of wonderfully sustainable, but equally soft and comfortable and cool and relaxing sheets from SheetsandGigglescom. They are the shit, I kid you not. Once you get a set of these things on your bed, you will throw away your crappy cotton sheets forever and ever, for an eternity, ah, man, because these are that amazing you won't even want to take them off the bed. Throw them in a wash and just be like ah, they're so comfortable, I don't care how dirty these are, I'm just gonna stay in them forever. At least that's how I feel. I'm gonna still wash mine, but anyway.
Speaker 1:
So, as you know, there's been endless political developments over the course of the last few days. Like Hunter Biden testified behind closed doors yesterday, which was absolutely fucking insane. If you've had the opportunity to view some of the transcripts, he was tearing into Republicans left and right, I mean, this whole impeachment inquiry is probably dead, or at least it should be dead based on the fact that they're. Well, the fact that Republicans haven't presented any facts in Hunter Biden is tearing their asses a new one, especially about his qualifications to be on the board of Barisma and knowing that he was on the board of numerous companies, and the fact that any potential allegations that President Biden was involved in any of his business activities was, it is totally unproven, if not totally false. And the details that Hunter provided about whether or not his father was actually involved in any sort of meetings or whether not, appear to be pretty mundane, like a couple of phone calls as he was meeting. As he was meeting with other members of the world food program, usa, just a non-profit that feeds, like you know, tens of millions of kids every year. Just, you know they don't really have anything and the coming up snake eyes and he's also hammering them on their lack of concern with. You know the idea that, even as Donald Trump was running for president, his son-in-law, who was working in the White House. We had a classified security clearance, was was flying halfway across the world to meet with other leaders and heads of state in the Middle East, and then, of all, I.
Speaker 1:
After leaving office, he receives like a two billion dollar payout. Why aren't you guys concerned with that? They don't have any explanation as to why they shouldn't be here. They are doing their best to dig up dirt on Hunter Biden in an effort to impeach President Biden for political reasons. I mean, you know, look, I get it. You got to do what you got to do to try and win these elections.
Speaker 1:
But this is fucking absurd, especially considering you know a number of witnesses that the GOP was trying to use to impeach President Biden, or either foreign agents or are fleeing the law or are currently incarcerated and are also Russian assets, apparently. And that is in direct reference to Alexander Smirnov, who's I think he's sitting in a jail in California awaiting his pretrial hearings, considering that the Department of Justice has asked that he be detained until trial, given that he lied about the amount of money that he had in his bank account, saying it was, I believe, thirty thousand dollars or something of that amount, and it turns out that he has close to three million, which is just a wild, wild, wild number. It's like the reverse trap, where Trump's shit is worth like seventeen million dollars get more logo and he's like arguing on his financial statements that it's worth like one point seven billion dollars. Fucking, yes, yeah. But also he has a number of contacts with foreign intelligence officials just a number of issues that make this dude a flight risk, and that's why DOJ is like, hey bro, we gotta keep this dude in jail until trial. It's entirely possible he's gonna flee. Like even in one of their previous filings in an attempt to get a California judge to detain the guy after I think it was a magistrate judge in Nevada was like, oh, it's okay, we just let the guy out. Just even they like they alluded to the idea that even his lawyers were attempting to help secure his release in order to aid him fleeing from justice, which is wild. It's a whole fucking spy movie right here.
Speaker 1:
And then the fact that there's guys there star witness and he made up all of this supposedly damning information about president Biden taking bribes. The Republicans are continuing to rely on this. Shit is bananas. It's bananas. Let me not guess they're not trying to rely on it, considering, I think, that the what House oversight committee had previously had the information that they received from this individuals transcripts or his 1083 forms, where he provided information to the FBI. They had put that they had placed that information on the website where they're publicizing some of the elements of their investigation and in that information, upon the discovery that Smirnoff is practically a Russian asset, they deleted that like rupro, rupro, yeah. So I mean you just got to keep a lookout for these guys. They constantly operate in bad faith and, if not bad faith, potentially damning conspiracy to use disinformation provided by Russian intelligence services to remove a certain president's president. It's crazy, it's beyond balkers that like the major mainstream media and talking about that is well, look, it's nothing I can do about that. All I can do is try and put out these podcast episodes and inform you of a few of these developments and hope you know eventually these things come to their logical conclusion.
Speaker 1:
Yeah, also so talked about this previously, but Trump filed a notice of appeal in the New York silver fraud trial saying hey, judge, you know I got this hundred million right here that I can secure a bond for. I know it ain't to fool out full amount? Can you hold up all on these collections and judges like Nassan where they have money at homie? And that is largely because New York state law requires that in these, these kind of civil suits, that if the defendant loses upon appeal they have to post the full amount of the judgment plus interest, for obvious reasons, you know, because If you could just appeal the thing forever and never have to turn over any money, that would that would harm the movements in these cases where the defendant, you know should should they have sufficient funds to pay legal fees could just delay things indefinitely in the ship whenever he was. It would never come to a resolution. But clearly he doesn't have the money to appeal these multiple verdicts in New York.
Speaker 1:
But a lot of people have been talking about the fact that what is it? The SEC, I believe the Securities and Exchange Commission approved the, the merger of Trump's true social company with the SPAC digital world acquisitions. That was Set to basically take a true social public which, given the amount of shares that Trump owns in the social media company, it would probably net him about Three or four billion dollars in net worth. Should this merger take place now, obviously everyone's assuming that, hey, he can cash out, take these three billion dollars and do whatever he wants with it. It's not quite the case. There's practically a six-month hold on Any of the shareholders of the social media company from the date of the merger, preventing them from selling any of their shares, meaning that if the deal takes place, you know, late March, early April We'll just say April 1st you know the earliest he'd be able to cash out on some of his shares would be October, and then that's. You know. That's assuming a lot.
Speaker 1:
Like people have used the value of this SPAC Based on the fact that they know it's gonna be merging with Trump's company and like it's basically game stop at this point. It's a beam stock and there's no way that, over the course of the six months of, you know, these shares being publicly traded, that the values, that the values going to remain At the level it is and even if it, you know it's still worth Billions of dollars by then, the fact that Trump would be trying to move massive amounts of shares In order to cash out would cause the value of the stock to drop, which would mean he would get less and less for every, for every share that he sold, which means he would eventually take the company and by trying to sell, you know, 50, 60% Of the shares of the company. It's the. It's the Elon problem, right? It went into massive debt to fund Twitter or fund the Twitter purchase, debt that was borrowed against a massive number of shares in Tesla. But he also sold a massive number of shares of his Tesla stock to fund the rest of it, which therefore calls the value of Tesla stock to drop significantly.
Speaker 1:
So the same thing would basically apply to Trump trying to ditch shares of truth social in order to fund his lifestyle or his legal fees or his campaign or the civil judgments. Like he would get diminishing returns on each share After selling them off because the stock price would drop and even then, like what good is that going to do as far as the civil judgments go? Because he's gonna have to come up with that money damn near immediately. We're almost A month away from the E Gene Carroll decision, meaning that she can start collecting fairly soon here, and we're only a few weeks away From the tisha James being able to show up to the financial monitor of Trump or work saying, hey, where's the cash at? Bitch, better have my money, like she, reanna or something, and if he ain't got the money, she can be like, alright, what, hand over them building show and then, considering that, I would imagine Giving it. It's a real estate company in New York.
Speaker 1:
Like all of the assets he owns are probably Underwater as far as having loans and liens placed against him being selling them off. You know, trumpet have to pay taxes on that capital gains tax, and then we'd also have another tax and then we'd also have to take whatever proceeds are left and then satisfy those loan agreements and then whatever was left would be used to satisfy these judgments. And you know, if he happened to have any cash left over, then I imagine that would be returning him. Of course, you know, coming up with half a billion dollars probably not gonna get any cash back in his pocket. After all, this shit is liquidated, I would imagine. So, yeah, he's a long way off from the true social merger saving his ass. He's a long, long way off from that and I guess like the only potential way that he could get out of this is if this merger goes through and he's able to take out a massive loan against the value of the shares which you know, given that he's basically unable to do business in the United States as far as financial institutions go, probably not gonna have the easiest time doing that. Of course I guess it's possible. Maybe some of you know his foreign collaborators could come to his aid, but again, it's that's not gonna happen overnight, probably not in time enough to save his ass from Tis James in New York. He can try it though.
Speaker 1:
Now, as far as the legal jeopardy he's facing is concerned, you know the Supreme Court has basically stepped in and guaranteed that, barring some unforeseen circumstances, his DC coup trial is probably not gonna happen before the election and it's just basically scheduling at this point, like the Supreme Court deciding that they were finally gonna take up the issue now instead of in December when Jack Smith asked to just leap for all the DC Court of Appeals. That practically ensures that we won't get a decision on that matter. Only then we will be hopeful, you know, june if we're lucky. And then there are some ways that they could delay it even further by not coming to a conclusion and sending it back down to the DC Court of Appeals for more fact finding, which would definitely delay the trial until after the election. But even if we get the ruling in June.
Speaker 1:
Like the scheduling of the DC trial is just so up in the air, considering we have Judge Daly and Cannon down in Florida doing everything that you can to block the DC trial from taking place. Like now that there's been a delay in DC, she's willing to reschedule the May Court date for a later date. I think Jack Smith and company are asking for early June. Of course Trump's lawyers are like hey, can we just put this off to after the election? And I think what Judge Cannon is going to do is, given the fact that we know for Chuck in to hold the trial in DC that it will probably have to take place sometime in September or October, that Cannon is going to schedule her trial for early to mid September, blocking out that date for Judge Chuck in and then proceed to do as many things as possible to delay all of the pre trial proceedings so that the Florida documents case won't be able to go to trial in September or October either, and then, as we get close to the trial date, she'll just move it again, having effectively blocked Chuck in from taking that date as well, pushing all of Trump's trials, minus the New York City hush money 2016 election interference case until after the 2020 election.
Speaker 1:
Now, I'm not a lawyer, so you can take my opinion on that scenario playing out with a great assault, but me being a regular fucking dude, if I can figure that out the Supreme Court definitely understands what the fuck is going on, right? So their decision to like take up Trump's appeal on presidential immunity like even the decision is fucking into the decision to even take it up for ruling is fucking insane. Like you could let this sit. Like let him go to trial If he wants to peel it after trial great the Supreme Court to be right there. But they're like nah, let's put a this effectively leave this day in place, delaying the DC trial indefinitely. And they can look at the schedule and they can see just like I can see that the odds of this taking place before the election are practically 5050. And then, once the election happens, you know it's basically a 5050 chance that Trump wins. If Trump wins, this trial is never going to happen.
Speaker 1:
Now, what the Supreme Court is going to say hey, you know the important merits of this case and its effect on, like what the office of the presidency is like this is super important and merits our attention. Well, damn, you can't say this merits our attention, but also Like you're willing to take this on a schedule. Like the delays, the trial, which is of actual importance, until after the election, where there's a scenario where it won't take place. Like you can't have it both ways. Like it can be super important, meritorious argument that needs the full attention of the Supreme Court, but also like the real world implications of the actual election aren't super important. Like pick one guys. So obviously they're in the bag for Trump, or at least enough of the justices sitting on the Supreme Court I imagine it would. It took at least four or five to grant cert on this issue. They're in the back for Trump.
Speaker 1:
Now, how we got here, like the fact that they can be so blatant about it. Well, they dipped their toe in the waters just a few weeks ago when they were hearing Trump's, where they were hearing Trump's appeal to his removal from the ballot in Colorado, where they basically came out in front of everyone and told y'all, they running with this, they're going to put Trump back on the ballot. It was pretty obvious in the parent that if you had the opportunity to watch the proceedings as they, as they were broadcast, that they were super skeptical, this idea that Trump could be removed from the ballot, based on section three of the 14th Amendment, even though the plain text says hey, if a motherfucker out here commit an insurrection or give an A in comfort to insurrectionist after he's taken an oath to office, dude is up out of there. But surprise, surprise, you know when you're in the Senate, surprise, surprise, you know when it's inconvenient. They don't give a fuck what the text of the Constitution says, so they dip their toe in, going full Trump or in. And because no one in the media and the public, because no one was outraged, because they face no backlash whatsoever, they were like, fine, cool, fuck it. Like, if we're not going to, if no one's going to, like, sound off because there are no consequences for us, do whatever the fuck we want. And here we are. You're likely not going to get your. Your Trump cool trial.
Speaker 1:
The most important criminal prosecution in the history of the United States, is going to be delayed by a couple clown shit. We like to buy a clown show and judge Roberts and Alito Clarence Thomas, whose wife is a fucking co-conspirator, and I'll get to that in a second and in three other dudes that were pointed by Trump and they're gonna fucking get away with it because apparently, you know, there's no one in the Democratic Party that's elected a member of Congress and I'm talking to you, democrat. At last sit it like where's the Senate judiciary To you know? Request, formally request Clarence Thomas recuse himself from this shit. Whoo, but alas, this is the situation we're in. These the cars were dealt. Where do we go from here? What is Jack Smith supposed to do? Well, obviously he's refocused his efforts on making sure the Florida trial goes to Florida case goes to trial before the election. Probably not gonna work out. What can he do? Well, I talked about this Like as it happened when the indictments were unsealed in DC.
Speaker 1:
One of the things Jack Smith probably should have done was include Jeannie Thomas's cool emails with the fake electors and John Eastman in those documents and that way he would have preemptively precluded the Supreme Court from like stepping in and taking this case for Trump, like that probably would have done it, because then it would have been like too hot to touch, but he didn't because he made this thing extreme line as possible. So what, what like? What available strategies Does he have to make sure the Supreme Court doesn't get away with this bullshit. He could subpoena Jeannie Thomas. I Feel like that would effectively in their interference in this, like it would be such a fucking headline that it'd be impossible. It'd be impossible. They just Like. I don't know what the course of action they would take from there would be. They'd probably just have to let the rule extend. You could also file a superseding indictment Including those emails and text messages in the indictment, which again would effectively lead to the same situation.
Speaker 1:
Besides just standing pat and hoping things that the Supreme Court play out of such a way to leave him enough time for Judge Chuck in a scheduled trial before the election, his other option is to just give up entirely on the idea of getting the January 6th trial To take place before November and instead Going full throttle Inditing all of Trump's co-conspirators, whether that be the fake electors or the members of Congress who were involved with that plot, or or the January 6th War room attendees who have coordinate all this shit. You know the people that no one ever talks about anymore, that the press just gave up on investigating. I don't think they asked any fucking questions about that. Like all those people and all of the individuals the Jack Smiths continue to investigate since dropping these indictments last year, because that investigation never stopped. He's still been at it.
Speaker 1:
So he knows a lot more than whatever information is publicly available, even more so, then, what the January 6th committee might know, and he can drop a massive indictment of all those people and he can release what is known as a speaking indictment, where he puts when he puts an extraordinary amount of detail about the crimes that took place and the criminal plot.
Speaker 1:
It makes that publicly available so that the nation has access to the truth before they make their decision on who to vote for in November. And you know from what I've seen of the dude's work, he's always prepared, he's always thinking ahead, he always has a plan B and a plan C, and I'm sure that's one option that he's seen, one option that he's sitting on. I just know one thing we can't afford to let him jack this off. Gotta pull the trigger on something and make sure we get some accountability for people who try to overthrow our government Before they have an opportunity to get back in the office and end our democracy. And that concludes this episode of part of the interaction. You, you, you, you, you, you, you, you you.