Pardon The Insurrection
Where we discuss the ongoing Congressional and criminal investigations of the January 6 coup orchestrated by the former President. And because insurrection wasn't enough, we'll also cover the Department of Justice espionage investigation, investigations relating to other members of Congress, and more. Don't worry, we're not handing out any pardons.
Pardon The Insurrection
Will Diddy The Diddler Take Politicians Down With Him
Can the wild world of celebrity parties conceal deeper, darker secrets? This episode uncovers the scandalous "freak off" parties hosted by Sean "Diddy" Combs, where allegations of sex trafficking and incriminating recordings loom large. With insights from Diddy’s former bodyguard, we explore how these tapes might tie into an ongoing corruption scandal in New York City politics, implicating local officials and revealing a hidden web of blackmail. Discover the strategies behind these high-stakes gatherings and the risks attendees take by staying silent.
Controversy doesn't end there as we unravel the unexpected drama between Michael Eric Dyson and Representative Nancy Mace. Following a heated CNN debate, Dyson's flirty texts to Mace added fuel to the fire, leading her to enter these messages into the congressional record. We dissect the implications of their interactions and the surprising nature of Dyson’s actions, juxtaposing his criticism of cancel culture with his personal behavior. This chapter reveals how personal attraction and political beliefs can clash in the public eye, creating a spectacle that’s anything but ordinary.
Lastly, we discuss the demise of high-end sex parties among the elite, stressing the importance of avoiding potential scandals through traditional social interactions. Highlighting the risks of being recorded and engaging in illicit activities, we critique figures like Diddy for their reckless behaviors. The conversation also touches on the legal consequences of misusing business funds for criminal endeavors, advocating for more conventional means of companionship to prevent reputational damage. Tune in for an eye-opening exploration of these complex and controversial topics.
Support the show:
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2003879/support
Follow our show's hosts on
Twitter:
twitter.com/@CoolTXchick
twitter.com/@Caroldedwine
twitter.com/taradublinrocks
twitter.com/blackknight10k
twitter.com/@pardonpod
Find Tara's book here:
Taradublinrocks.com
Find Ty's book here:
Consequence of Choice
Subscribe to Tara's substack:
taradublin.substack.com
Subscribe to Ty's substack:
https://theworldasiseeit.substack.com/
Support Our Sponsor: Sheets & Giggles
Eucalyptus Sheets (Recommended):
Sleep Mask (I use this every night)
Eucalyptus Comfortor
...
yes, so we're going back into the wild world of um sean, the alleged sex trafficker combs aka the diddler yes, diddler's political parties, uh, sean diddy combs former bodyguard revealed that the disgraced rat mogul kept tapes of politicians taking part in his infamous freak off sessions and claimed his arrest is tied to an alleged corruption scandal currently gripping New York City politics. Insider who protected Diddy through the 1990s told the Art of Dialogue podcast that the producer's indictment could expose high profile officials and celebrities in New York. So indictments coming down in New York.
Speaker 2:So, yeah, the SDNY, as you know, they indicted Diddy last week and ever since, I mean so it's been two things. It's been extraordinarily quiet in terms of, like, the number of celebrities and media personalities and politicians that we know partied with diddy over the course of the past you know, 25 years or so but it's also been extraordinarily loud in terms of the handful of people who've always been willing to kind of speak out against Diddy here, recently taking like a victory lap in his bodyguard as one of them. Now, the suggestion here is that politicians were attending these parties and some of them may have participated in some of the activities that you would deem unscrupulous but not necessarily illegal, and others may have engaged in such activities in a fashion that you might deem illegal. And I would say, like, if you're looking for like members of Congress, I don't get your hopes up necessarily. I don't get your hopes up necessarily like that he's been, you know, well-connected in terms of New York City politics over the course of the past couple of decades.
Speaker 3:I don't know necessarily how many like members of Congress you're going to find, having attended these parties, rudy Giuliani over and over again, he did throw a lot of parties in the. Hamptons, he did throw a lot of parties in the Hamptons. In the Hamptons he did throw a lot of parties in the Hamptons. So you would expect that you know New York elite, including politicians, would have been.
Speaker 2:Yeah, but why is?
Speaker 1:everyone so quiet. You're right D Where's the string of? I went to the white party but tweets.
Speaker 2:So, first of all, in terms of politicians and political names, think state local party new york, not like national politics. Now, second of all, like, where is everybody? I think one of the things you're gonna have is there are a lot of people who attended the normal party, right. So diddy was famous for like throwing these.
Speaker 2:You know multi white parties, as carol said well, not just the white parties, but just in general. Like his parties would span like days, like you know, like a 24 hour long fest, but like the party would start off say 11 o'clock, and then like the normal shit would go to four and then he would kick out all the normies like oh yes, and then the freak off began and then the weird shit would start.
Speaker 2:But then you know that's your cue. If that's not how you kick it to get out of dodge now. Yes, I'm assuming a massive amount of people who attended the normal party but didn't do the freak off shit are probably not gonna come out publicly against diddy just because they'd be associated with the weird shit, even if that's not what they were doing now I would also imagine that the people pictures everywhere yeah.
Speaker 2:Well, look, no, that's the thing, right. So that's how you get cover for doing the weird shit. You have everybody at the normal shit and then like, if anyone wants to come out and say something about it is like, hey, you party with diddy too. It's really hard. Like it's really hard to have plausible deniability, even if you didn't do anything, if you're at the normal party. But the people who are engaged in the weird shit, who didn't do any other criminal shit, they definitely can't come out and say anything derogatory about even just being there, those freaking motherfuckers that want to like uh eyes wide.
Speaker 2:Shut that shit and watch yeah, and we're talking about like not criminal activity, just you know weird sex king shit it's, it's all.
Speaker 1:it's criminal. Sometimes it sounds like not everyone was consensual.
Speaker 2:Yes, but before we get to that, so people who were at the parties not doing anything illegal or anything with someone non-consensually Like, well, those people definitely can't come out and speak about Diddy. Why? Because he has tapes right.
Speaker 2:So he's, you know, know, known for having recorded many, numerous instances of people which I believe epstein did also so yeah, now there is a likely what I imagine, a sliver of individuals who came to the normal parties and did the freaky stuff, but who also engaged in activity that we would probably deem criminal, who are also on tape, and those people are blackmailable and I imagine that's probably one of the reasons he was also recording those tapes as well. And again, like you got to think about it, if you're diddy like hey, why are you keeping these tapes? Dog like, if this is incriminating evidence, the only thing this is good for is getting you hemmed up in federal charges if you ever get caught. And the only other explanation likely is that he was using those tapes to either keep himself from getting caught yeah, because they were important people that would have been the ones investigating, and he's like hey, dog, this you.
Speaker 2:Well, I don't know how many tapes he would have of law enforcement officials that would possibly be in a position to investigate him, but that's a possibility.
Speaker 2:But I would imagine largely it's like people in the industry or people in related industries that he would do business with if we invite to these parties and get them in compromise, compromising situations, and then you have this ability to use these tapes for leverage over these people to get favorable business deals.
Speaker 2:Uh, and theoretically also, just like people that you don't fucking like, you always have something to hold over their head just because you don't fucking like them.
Speaker 2:I mean it's let's not get it twisted here uh, like diddy's made a lot of enemies over the course of the decades and one of the ways you disarm your enemies is by well, you know, sungzoo, uh, art, war, shit, um, but yeah, so don't necessarily expect this to apply like any of the tapes that Diddy may have had in his possession that are now in the possession of the feds to apply to, you know, like the type of political figures we talk about here on the podcast Members of Congress and, you know, national Republicans, or even Democrats, for that matter, members of Congress and national Republicans, or even Democrats for that matter. But on the flip side here I don't think we're done with sex scandals in terms of national politics. We did have that raid of that. What was it so that outside of DC a few months ago where they raided the I don't know, it was like a prostitution ring or something oh yeah, I know yes and we never right.
Speaker 2:We never heard anything about any of the individuals. That shit came and went real fast yeah, it went real fast like we never heard about any of the patrons. They just like the two guys involved in trafficking, basically the women as prostitutes. But we didn't hear about any of like the wealthy billionaires or media personalities or politicians that were frequenting that. That just got totally buried. I'm sure that might resurface at some point.
Speaker 2:That's far more likely to take down politicians than anything Diddy was doing, or at least, like you know, national DC politicians. Um, although I guess fingers crossed, you can always hope. All right, ty, after you.
Speaker 3:All right, we've got. Michael Eric Dyson shoots his shot at Nancy Mace. Michael Eric Dyson ranted against cancel culture during an appearance on the View where he asked about flirty, where he was asked about flirty private messages he sent to Representative Nancy Mace. Following a noteworthy clash between the two on CNN, mace entered the messages from Dyson into the congressional record during a house oversight hearing. In the messages, dyson told Mace the pair look good together, but not to tell anybody. He also sent a kissy face emoji with this message. When Mace sent a laughing face emoji back, dyson complimented Mace's gorgeousness all right.
Speaker 2:So Michael Eric Dyson is? He's just a prominent figure in terms of political analysis and all this. He just like it, he's. I think he's currently yes, it's, laugh it up, it's funny. So I think he's currently a professor here in Nashville, where I currently reside at Vanderbilt University. And first of all, we'll just have to play the clip.
Speaker 3:I always like that dude. I mean I don't dislike him.
Speaker 2:No, I am extraordinarily fine and he's not wrong.
Speaker 1:I mean, she's an awful person, but she's very attractive.
Speaker 2:All right.
Speaker 1:First of all great rec.
Speaker 3:Thank you I was just going to say she got some good titties. You're right.
Speaker 2:All right, let's play the clip of Nancy Mace.
Speaker 4:I would like to also enter into the record a screenshot of a text message I received from the esteemed professor from Vanderbilt, michael Eric Dyson. Esteemed professor from Vanderbilt, michael Eric Dyson. After my CNN interview, begged me for photos. In this text he says after calling me racist on CNN, don't tell anybody. We look good together and sent me a kissy emoji.
Speaker 2:Without objection.
Speaker 4:And the guy says I'm gorgeous in all these photos. I don't think he's that bent out of shape on how anyone pronounces Kamala and if we're going to have that, standard.
Speaker 2:you got to hold it to both sides, not just one or the other. Oh, and we also have a clip of the conversation between Dr Dyson and Nancy Mace here on CNN. It's the history and legacy of white disregard for the humanity of black people.
Speaker 4:So now you're calling me racist.
Speaker 2:I didn't say it. I just said you weren't racist.
Speaker 1:That is complete. Yes, you don't have to intend racism to accomplish it?
Speaker 3:No, no, no. You are intending that I am racist? Your disrespect of Kamala Harris is part of the racial opportunity.
Speaker 2:What can you just say?
Speaker 4:It's offensive Congresswoman. What?
Speaker 2:can you just say I'm not calling you a racist, you are. You absolutely do it looks like a lover's qualm.
Speaker 4:Now, what's disgusting is?
Speaker 2:your disrespect of her Professor. This gentleman said I didn't know her name. You know what's?
Speaker 1:disgusting to women is her disrespect of women.
Speaker 4:She doesn't know what a woman is.
Speaker 2:And if, 25 years ago, I became White women, don't have the ability to tell black women, who paid the price of blood to make this country what it is, to tell them they're not real women 25 years ago I became the first woman to graduate from the citadel. The military, as you can see there, that was a lover's.
Speaker 3:That was a lover's spat you stopped ty.
Speaker 2:So, as you can see there, there was an extraordinarily heated conversation. Oh now, like if you watch the entirety of that, uh, just, I actually don't even know what to call it. I don't know what to score that was good, that was enough if you watch the entirety of that back and forth.
Speaker 2:Uh, at no point did did dyson refer to her as a racist. He was talking about, uh, the way in which he intentionally misstates kamala harris's name. Even after she was corrected, she proceeded to do it again and they called her out on that and that's how they entered into that discussion there.
Speaker 1:But his response is gross, but what should be noted?
Speaker 3:is when she was in her shoulder pads that she pronounced Kabbalah Harris, his name right, which proves that she can do it.
Speaker 2:Yeah, that's the thing. She's not getting it wrong out of ignorance, it's out of malice and that was the whole point and that's why a part of the conversation.
Speaker 3:Those shoulder pads were distracting God damn Now after that.
Speaker 1:They were acute angles. Yeah, they were.
Speaker 2:She looks like she could start as, like a cornerback for nfl team. Um, no. So after that, apparently they took a picture, uh, and I think they engaged in sending some text messages back back and forth to which it appears as though dyson was flirting with mace. And now a lot of you like are probably looking at this, especially if you're a woman listening to this podcast Like in what world would a man who had a conversation with a woman like that then proceed to hit on her? And you know, in that assessment I would say, yes, you're absolutely right. That makes absolutely no sense logically.
Speaker 2:But also men, so now he now yes, that part now there was a period of time between the sending of those text messages and then mace like publicly getting into like a social media spat and disparaging him in the house committee. Whatever that aside, I would say that like man it's as an extraordinarily shallow man it points in my life. Uh, I don't think I would stoop to the level of trying to flirt and like. Let's be clear here, the messages he was sending were extraordinarily flirty. He like tried to cover it up and like a like he tried to explain it away in like a 10 gorgeousness is a term of art in the field of aesthetic appraisal you know and I'm not even gonna lie like I I was really surprised by this.
Speaker 3:I know that michael erick dysson has a penis and he is a man, however, and he has eyes and they work Her. I, I, I expected better from him than this, but that just goes to show, like in my mind, the hold that those non melanated women have on our men, hold that those non-melanated women have on our men, regardless of how in tune they are, or supposedly, for the cause.
Speaker 2:But I don't know. Are you trying to say dr umar is right? No, so now dyson did comment like a 10 minute long social media post about like how his interactions with numerous women that he's got a working relationship with like do occasionally involve him commenting on their appearance in like a you know, wait a second, can I let me finish?
Speaker 2:So, in his, in his perspective, the argument he was making is that, like just a part of his communication with women that he's friendly with is, if it's not in an appropriate, not in an inappropriate fashion, he is willing to comment on their appearance and, you know, make proclamations as to the level of you know their their dress or attire or appearance and he gave numerous examples and I will say in some sense it's totally understandable that the people he's familiar with in the messages that he read that he wants to fuck.
Speaker 2:No, in the way that he was communicating. If you're familiar with him on that level, you probably wouldn't take anything from it. But that's people you have a working, longstanding relationship with and, like you're very, and he was more reserved.
Speaker 3:You're familiar with each other, so to speak.
Speaker 2:Yeah, but also those comments were a lot more reserved than the comments that he was making to Mace here. And then he was using that as cover to suggest that, like this is the way I communicate, like this was not intended to be like flirtatious with Nancy Mace here, and then he was using that as cover to suggest that, like this is the way I communicate, like this was not intended to be like flirtatious with Nancy Mace. Now, that's an obvious lie. He was trying to get his shit off. Now he might not have necessarily been like, yeah, girl, come on over to the crib, but what he was doing is trying to see what was up he was trying to see what was up he was throwing that fish line out there to see what he got back yeah, now has she been like, yeah, what up?
Speaker 2:he probably would have been like alright, let's go he would have smashed that bitch.
Speaker 3:Yes, now, now.
Speaker 2:I just this is like a totally unimportant conversation. I just wanted to get my jokes off about this because I thought it was extraordinarily funny and I like Michael Eric Dyson, so it's kind of. I mean, he doesn't know me, I would imagine, other than maybe on Twitter, but like just to throw shots at a dude, just a little lighthearted ribbing, sir, if you happen to be listening to the podcast.
Speaker 3:Please follow me back.
Speaker 2:I totally understand what you see in Nancy Mace from a physical perspective. I mean, it's difficult to just deny that she's physically attractive. But in terms of her personality, I'd smash her if she wasn't racist look I get it like what's.
Speaker 1:The worst that she could do is read it live on air on some.
Speaker 3:TV show but the second worst that she could do is reject you and the worst she could do is boil his rabbit and then, oh, she looks like that type.
Speaker 1:That's rough um so just shoot a puppy. I mean, she's the puppy shooter. I personally just don't think they gotta be yeah, close enough.
Speaker 2:Her husband's into some weird shit too. We might get to that on the next podcast. Stay tuned for the next episode of weird shit in Marsha Blackburn's little. Yeah, so her husband engages in some activity.
Speaker 3:Well, anyway, we'll oh, oh yeah, we don't have time for that today.
Speaker 2:I need to research that shit yeah, well, I mean, you probably won't know unless you look at him or hear him talk. And then you're like, huh, I got, I got some questions. Well, we'll validate those questions next time. But in terms of like, trying to have a romantic encounter with someone who presumably you hate everything they stand for, that ain't how I kick it. Like, yeah, maybe there might be like a girl that we hate each other, but because of like the antipathy, there's some kind of sexual tension, but not someone who I, just, you know, hate like the ideals for which they stand for.
Speaker 2:Like that a person like Nancy Mace is allowed to exist as a person is kind of disgusting to me and it'd be a complete turnoff. I wouldn't be remotely interested. I, I can't, I can't. Now again, you know it may be in michael eric dyson's case. He's got a little taste of this mara robinson here where he wants to presumably um, well, he, I don't know, maybe he gets off in some ways on subverting someone who presumably is interested in continuing the oppression of the black community and subverting that sexually. I don't know what his deal is, maybe that's his bandicoot way, like maybe that's what his is.
Speaker 3:Like I'm going to take this racist bitch and I'm going to fucking flip her on her back or stomach or whatever the fuck he wants to do and turn her the fuck out. Maybe there's some kind of weird ass. I'm going to fuck this racist white bitch kink going on.
Speaker 2:Yeah, that's, that's what I was getting at Likelihood, I have likely on a handful of occasions, probably engaged in some romantic activity with someone who, if you looked at their politics- Hate sex.
Speaker 1:You had hate sex, no.
Speaker 2:I was going to say could likely, if you looked at their politics, be deemed a white supremacist in some regard, but typically their husbands were there. So before we, before we get out of here, oh interesting okay before we get out of here, we'll you know. I guess we're done with our shithole of the week phase until post election, but we will do our we forgot one oh yeah.
Speaker 2:Well, see, what happened was a tie skipped on over it, and it's getting late and of course you know, okay, it's close to your bedtime, so we'll just save that one for next time.
Speaker 2:And I want to have more sex with my husband tonight, so yeah, fair enough, you know, since this has been the raunchiest part of the Insurrection podcast episode ever. Okay, really shortly. So Olivia Newsy of the New York magazine you might be familiar with some of her work and covering politics over the course of the last couple of years. She apparently was engaged in some kind of private relationship with RFK Jr that she alleges was not physical but apparently did involve sending RFK Jr some nudes, some nudes.
Speaker 2:Now I of course, like, if you read some of her comments, rather some of her articles in terms of referencing RFK Jr, you might be like, hey, this is a really weird political slant that you might have in favor of RFK Jr here, to the point where you know she does the thing, where it's like, oh, the left is bad, the right is also bad, but RFK Jr's our fucking hero. Now you might look at that and be like, oh, this is some weird leftist shit that. Or you're like, oh, she's having an affair with RFK Jr. Because those are the only two explanations, and apparently she was attempting to have an affair with RFK Jr. And I would just ask Because he's so sexy.
Speaker 3:Yeah, because he's so sexy. Yeah, he's got that sexy voice. Please whisper in my ear about the time you cut that Wilhut's off.
Speaker 2:Yeah, well you see, in the 90s I was hanging out with the fellow.
Speaker 3:My brain worm is coming. Remember when you fisted that bear cub's head?
Speaker 2:Yeah, I was just going to say like over the course of the past year where you're covering political campaigns. Like at what point was it you decided, yeah, rfk Jr, give me that dick? Was it like abusing his wife? Or like you know the weird drug thing, the drug habits? Was it being a coke dealer when he was in college? Was it the bear that he left in Central Park? Was it the whale head that he strapped onto the top of his car? Like at what point were you like, yeah, give me some of that. So before we get out of here, kamala Harris campaign heat check how you guys feeling Ty you feeling about here. Kamala Harris campaign heat check how you guys feeling Ty you feeling about the state of the Harris campaign.
Speaker 3:You know what I am feeling, absolutely invigorized by the Harris campaign. My concern is not with her campaign, it's with the fuckery that Republicans are doing, but I am energized for it. People that we would not even expect in rural Texas, in rural counties, I mean the fucking villages of all places, are on board with Harris Waltz and that's that makes me feel, that gives me the warm and fuzzies like all the way around shout out to the villagers man, y'all hang in there.
Speaker 2:I know the hurricane is probably gonna be tough.
Speaker 3:I'm hoping they get the STD right down there. Stop fucking everywhere.
Speaker 3:I don't think the hurricane clean that up but I think that that is also why Republicans are scrambling to try and do anything and everything they can, like Lindsey Graham, like trying to get Nebraska to change their fucking rules, their electoral college rules at the last minute, et cetera. But the thing is with the gerrymandering, they usually do it around black and brown communities, trying to suppress the Democrat vote. But because so many Republicans, so many independents are behind Harris rooting for her, going to vote for her, that's not going to fucking work. That's not going to fucking work. That's not going to fucking work. And now they are just scrambling. Her vibe, her momentum is amazing and I am still holding out hope that, despite all the fuckery that they're trying to pull on the other side, that she is going to pull this out.
Speaker 2:Man, I can't wait, yeah, no matter what chapel ron says. All right, carol, how you feeling?
Speaker 3:harris campaign okay we'll talk about her on the next pod, yeah we'll save that for next episode she's doing great.
Speaker 1:I want to write postcards, but they still haven't shown up. From moms moms rising get me my freaking postcards that were free.
Speaker 2:So thanks, moms rising, um also subscribe to the podcast and, if you, watch us on youtube. Make sure you subscribe.
Speaker 3:Rate yes, give review, give us five stars, leave your comments and, uh, leave your thoughts in the comments unless they're mean, only if they're good comments, because if they're not good, then we're gonna like, we're gonna take them out, because like we like that Leave, all the of the leave, all of the ridiculous like shit posting comments this is YouTube, but it doesn't need to be YouTube, you know.
Speaker 2:No, we'll take all the comments, even the bad ones, are good for the algorithm. So thanks, please, but yes, so yes, send Carol her postcards. All the comments, even the bad ones, are good for the algorithm. So thanks, please, but yes. So yes, send carol her postcards. Um, no, look, I mean, I think in terms of like what the polls say, and I'm I know we've recently gotten this uh, what is it new york times sienna polling that suggests that trump is now leading in a bunch of swing states. But if you look at, like the flip from where they leave it.
Speaker 2:I'll get to that if you look at like the flip from where they believe it.
Speaker 2:I'll get to that.
Speaker 2:If you look at like the flip from where they were in the most recent uh, new york times seeing a poll, to where they were the last time they polled, something like in arizona you see a 10 point flip. I mean, obviously that's not real if you just take a look at what's happening in reality. So the way I look at polling typically is like I don't care what the actual number is in regards to, hey, this number is that what you kind of look for, because they're like snapshots over time for one, and then again polling can be super accurate, inaccurate rather, and in terms of predicting elections, not very useful. But I think one of the ways in which they're valuable is like changes over time, right. I think one of the ways in which they're valuable is like changes over time, right, but only in the sense that if you can connect those changes to real life events that you see play out on the ground and appear to reflect the reality that you see in real life, like, and what I would say is like if you, if you're a fan of football and you watch a football team play. And then you look at the stats after the game you're like, oh, that's surprising, it didn't like. The way I saw the game play out in real time doesn't really reflect what I'm seeing in the stats, like this team played a lot better and that quarterback quarterback played a lot worse than the stats. And I would like say you know that happens from time to time. Typically a hallmark of that is Kirk Cousins, where at the end of the season you're like, wow, he's got like 4,000 passing yards and 32 touchdowns. It was an incredible season. And if you watch the actual games you're like, hey, kirk Cousins not that good.
Speaker 2:So in terms of these polls, that, like what you're seeing on the ground, doesn't reflect the change that you see in these New York Times Sienna polls Maybe just take those polls with a grain of salt, but typically in these other polls showing her either tied or having a lead in most of the swing states and leading nationally at this point by anywhere from four to five points, I would say in terms of what the polling says, compared to what we've seen since she's become the nominee for the Democratic Party, she's sitting in a good position. Now obviously a lot of people are going to say hey, what about Hillary Clinton in 2016? The poll says she was up. Well, technically, she won the popular vote by millions of votes and the polls weren't really that far off. It just happened to be that in a handful of swing states it really mattered in terms of the electoral college, she lost by the tiniest of margins suspiciously small if you include, like, the fact that Russians were meddling in our election systems here in the United States.
Speaker 2:With that aside, I would say like part of the reason why Hillary lost in 2016 is because people looked at that polling lead and they were like, well, she's going to win. It's like how much does my vote really count on the left, and there were a bunch of conservatives who were like well, you know, trump sucks, but Hillary is going to win. You know what? What's the worst that could happen? What's the worst that could happen? I'll just go ahead and cast my vote and thereby Trump ended up winning, even though he lost by two and a half million votes, by the slimmest margin of like a handful of thousands of votes in swing states.
Speaker 1:What I would say is Jill Stein and everyone who voted for her.
Speaker 2:Yes, also. I mean this third party candidate, jill Stein, won enough votes in those swing states that Trump won. That would have been the difference in Clinton winning. So there's also that, and there's also, you know, james Comey showing up at the last minute announcing he was reopening and investing. So there were a lot of factors involved in 2016 that were novel, that we won't have, likely, in 2024.
Speaker 2:But also, we don't live in a vacuum, right. We have voters who existed in a world where that happened and now they're aware of the context, of how much their vote actually does matter, regardless of what the polls say. So you can't just say, just because that happened in 2016, you can't be overconfident. I would say, in terms of 2024, the way people need to look at it is it's not don't trust the vote polls, turn out and vote. It's like no, the polls say Kamala Harris is winning. Let's turn out the vote and then run up the score. Right, beat Trump so bad, beat the Republican Party so bad that after this, that they go the way of the Whigs and also I like that.
Speaker 2:They go the way of the Whig Party. Well, I guess that led to the collapse of the Whig Party. Depending on how you look at it was eventually to follow. Well, just repeat history in that regard. But also, if you happen to be a, a politician or you know a celebrity or a music artist or some kind of wealthy individual, I would just warn you if, for some reason, you're listening to this podcast like the freak off is dead, that shit is over. Like going to these.
Speaker 3:I want to go back to the days where freak off is not in our vernacular, is not in our vernacular and it's not a part of a everyday conversation. When I was watching the fucking DOJ guy and he's saying freak off, and every time I saw it and it's with a straight face it was dead, ass serious what he was saying. And I'm thinking to myself, though this is where we fucking are, where you're sitting here and you're what he was saying, and I'm thinking to myself, though this is where we fucking are okay, you're sitting here you're standing.
Speaker 3:He was like the freak off.
Speaker 2:I will delete. I will delete freak off from my vernacular. All right, so the high-end like sex party, that shit is over with. Like, if you have anything to lose politically or financially, sex parties is done. Right. I'm sorry that you save that shit for broke people Like learn how to go out to the bar and have a drink.
Speaker 3:Sex parties are for broke people Freak off.
Speaker 2:Well, sex party slash, freak off. They're now for broke people who don't have any social standing, who ain't got to worry about careers and being on the line. So learn how to go out to a bar, a drink, meet a girl the old-fashioned way, because the sex party, that shit is dead. Somebody's probably got you on tape and then y'all can't be trusted not to like not engage in some sort of criminal activity with, like the high-end drugs and the narcotics and having you know sex workers and forcing people to do things outside and if you're gonna have an orgy, man don't.
Speaker 1:There's gotta be a no phones policy.
Speaker 2:They're all off in the box, geez I mean diddy was having people sign an. Nda is the problem is diddy would have his phone out or have the camera out.
Speaker 1:Yeah, don't have it at did out. Yeah, don't have it at Diddy's house.
Speaker 2:Yeah, don't have it at Diddy's house.
Speaker 1:Now he won't be there, right.
Speaker 2:You're going to have to have, like normal one-on-one sex.
Speaker 3:I think we should liquidate all of his assets and give those to the victims. All right? Well, you say that.
Speaker 2:So the Department of Justice is part of this criminal indictment. If he's convicted because it was a racketeering case in which some of the proceeds from his legitimate businesses were used to fund the criminal activity, including the sex trafficking, he will likely have to forfeit a large amount of his company, which could could again lead to the end of bad boy entertainment and numerous other ventures of his. So that's you joke, but that's not entirely off the table in terms of possibility. But yeah, learn how to go out to a bar, have a drink, meet a girl, have a conversation and take her home, because going to these sex parties is just going to get you in. Well, don't do it, michael Eric Dyson style. I mean, for God's sake, have a conversation with somebody that actually likes you. No-transcript.
