Trump Is Ushering In The Turd Reich

Could the unexpected victory of Donald Trump in the 2024 U.S. presidential election transform global politics as we know it? Tune in as we dissect this shocking outcome, emphasizing the stark contrast between the muted reactions of American allies and the celebratory fervor among adversaries like Russia. We also examine Nancy Pelosi's sharp critique of the Democratic primary process and explore her insights on how different strategies might have reshaped the political landscape, potentially altering the path to victory for Democrats.

As political dynamics shift in Washington, radical plans to dismantle the so-called "deep state" are underway. We uncover bold moves to reform national security and intelligence agencies, including overhauling FISA courts and establishing a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. This critical discussion raises pressing questions about the future of American governance, the potential hollowing out of federal agencies, and the societal impacts of redirecting education funding from public to private institutions. How will these changes influence justice, intelligence operations, and military leadership?

Explore the intricate web of cronyism and policy-making in a potential second Trump administration, with a spotlight on key figures like Elon Musk. Our conversation dives into the controversial relationship between Trump and Musk, hinting at mutual dependencies and shared secrets. We further analyze the impact of third-party candidates like Jill Stein and RFK Jr. on the election's outcome, while considering Trump's foreign policy, especially regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The role of social media activism and its disappearing voices adds another layer to this complex political tapestry, prompting reflections on the future of both American and international politics.

Chapters

• 0:02 Political Analysis of Current Events
• 17:11 Dismantling the Deep State
• 25:47 Debating Trump's Cronyism and Policies
• 31:35 Impact of Third Party Votes

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:02

One, two, three, four. Hey, this is D-Night.

Speaker 2: 0:06

This is Carol, this is Ty.

Speaker 1: 0:09

You're listening to the Pardon the Insurrection podcast.

Speaker 2: 0:11

We meant it as a fucking joke. We meant Pardon the Insurrection as a play on words, not a suggestion. What the fuck? You're all fucked up. And that was literally about to happen.

Speaker 1: 0:20

He's about to pardon all the insurrectionists Again. So obviously, it's been quite the week since Trump snatched victory from the jaws of defeat and won in the 2024 presidential election. Boo-hoo, no one's excited about that. Literally across the world, numerous countries, people here in the United States, everywhere we're celebrating the victory of President Biden 2020 after his electoral victory in 2024. After Trump's electoral victory, the only people seemingly celebrating across the world are enemies of the United States, so that should probably give you some kind of indication as to where we're at as a country.

Speaker 4: 1:01

Zelensky was all of us today of indication as to where we're at as a country. Zelensky was all of us today.

Speaker 1: 1:05

That he was. He's defiantly claiming that he's not going to hand over Ukraine and their democracy to Vladimir Putin. I wish Americans?

Speaker 4: 1:16

No, he said a fucking terrorist. Well, yeah.

Speaker 1: 1:20

If you want to use his exact words in that regard. Yes, he said he's not going to hand over Ukraine to a fucking terrorist and Vladimir Putin. I wish Americans had to share that same sentiment, but apparently too many people are too stupid to be allowed to vote. Unfortunately, they're now in power and they're going to use that power against us, but not again. Even though many people across the world were displeased with the election of Donald Trump to the White House, there were, well, we'll say, a certain country out there who was quite delighted about the event, and they were on their media.

Speaker 2: 2:01

Proof that the McCarthyism maybe didn't go hard enough the first time on their media.

Speaker 1: 2:05

Proof that the McCarthyism maybe didn't go hard enough the first time, maybe so, but on their media outlet they did share a welcome video to the newly incoming second Trump administration.

Speaker 2: 2:24

You remember, we can't speak Russian, right?

Speaker 1: 2:26

So for the audio audience out there I picked up what they were putting down.

Speaker 4: 2:31

I can't even see the Russian.

Speaker 1: 2:33

For the audio only. Audience out there for your information, that was a video played by.

Speaker 2: 2:37

That was me, because I couldn't find the screen with the video in it.

Speaker 1: 2:43

For the audio only audience out there listening to the podcast. That was, I don't understand, carol. So that was a video played by russian state media. That is probably the funniest, legitimately most hilarious instance of revenge porn I've ever seen, by playing nude, showing nude photos of melnie Trump. It was extraordinarily hilarious. Kudos to those guys Like you played the game great over there in Moscow. You did it. You got your boy in office and the second he wins, you hold the barrel, hold the gun over his head and be like look bro, step out of line. We will basically unload all of the compromising information and materials that we have on you against you. So, yeah, good job guys. That was. That was incredible.

Speaker 2: 3:32

Uh, I just I really wish I'd seen that.

Speaker 1: 3:35

Uh, you'll see it next time. So, uh, just you know, in terms of unfortunate set of circumstances, uh, don't think America has experienced anything about nearly as detrimental to just American society as they're about to experience. Over the course of the next four, four and a half years, it's going to be rough out there. It's like, obviously, as you see here, our allies are cowering in fear. It's extraordinarily quiet out there in these streets and our adversaries are like awesome job America. Again, it's just an unfortunate set of circumstances. All we can do at this point, I would imagine, is dig in, fight our fight and hope that the bad guys, including the Trump administration and Trump himself, make a number of mistakes. They put us in a position to capitalize maybe as soon as 2026, if we do in fact have midterm elections. But beyond Russia, state media celebrating with nude pics of Melania Trump, which I'm sure absolutely no one needed to see, we do have comments here from Nancy Pelosi about the outcome of the election and, potentially, what might have gone wrong.

Speaker 3: 4:57

Had the president gotten out sooner, there may have been other candidates in the race. The anticipation was that if the president were to step aside, that there would be an open primary and, as I say, Kamala may have. I think she would have done well in that and been stronger going forward. But we don't know that that didn't happen. We live with what happened and because the president endorsed Kamala Harris immediately, that really made it almost impossible to have a primary at that time I really wouldn't throw a goddamn shoe at her face If it had been much earlier.

Speaker 3: 5:34

It would have been different.

Speaker 1: 5:36

So a couple of things there, right, obviously, nancy Pelosi didn't want Biden to run for reelection at all, and then, after a semi-poor, poor debate, obviously she didn't want Kamala to run either.

Speaker 4: 5:49

I mean, that's what I got, that was my takeaway.

Speaker 1: 5:51

Fuck her so after a semi, you know poor performance at a presidential debate. She decided to stab the Democratic candidate in the back by rallying the rest of the members of Congress to lobby Joe Biden to drop out.

Speaker 2: 6:07

He finally, she was suggesting there should have been an open primary in the middle of July.

Speaker 1: 6:13

That's exactly what she said. Well, she's suggesting that he should have dropped out earlier or earlier in the year to allow enough time for an open primary. Get to that in just a second. So in getting the thing that she wanted specifically Joe Biden dropping out she did not get what she wanted, which was Kamala Harris not being the Democratic nominee, and she's suggesting that if Biden had dropped out earlier in the race, there would have been time for a process to play out. I've got a couple of counterpoints for that. So the last time we had a presidential candidate who was an incumbent president drop out of the race with a contested primary, the Democratic Party got destroyed. You might have some well considering the DNC. The National Convention was held in Chicago over the course of the summer. That has a lot of ties to the last time this happened, when the previous DNC was held in Chicago, so we repeated history there. Apparently, we're not willing to learn from our mistakes, but maybe that'll change the next time around.

Speaker 4: 7:17

No, I quit fucking with Nancy Pelosi when she turned her back on Katie Hill with the whole revenge porn thing. Like she should have stood by her but forcing her to resign, like already humiliated, instead of standing behind her as a woman. I was through with Nancy. I was through with Pelosi since then because I was like bitch like for real.

Speaker 4: 7:38

The Democratic Party definitely needs to learn a lesson about standing behind their elected officials, who've done nothing wrong, for that matter exactly and that made all the difference, and then making her feel like when she did nothing wrong and she's got this abusive ex and the revenge porn, as well as her standing behind henry cuelar where is he at now? Over jessica cisneros, who would have been a fantastic, uh, progressive candidate down in the Rio Grande Valley, and she had tremendous support and I think their votes, if I'm not mistaken, were only like a few hundred apart, but they went all in on the establishment pro-life Democrat, because Pelosi hates young people and she hates young women especially. She hates progressive young women especially. She definitely changed my mind. Well, she definitely hates progressive, progressives.

Speaker 1: 8:34

But in part it kind of depends on where you're trying to run that progressive Like it's difficult to run. I know she's a thousand, I get that.

Speaker 1: 8:42

No, no, no, Wait, wait, wait, wait a second run. I know she's a thousand, I get that. No, no, wait, wait, wait a second. So in in some cases, like running a progressive candidate in a really red district, is just tough to pull off, generally speaking, because you've got built-in disadvantages. But she's also been against some progressive candidates in in blue landing states and look I was like katie hill flipped her seat blue yeah and then, when they pushed her out, boom goes to my car, yeah

Speaker 5: 9:09

I got red and henry queller.

Speaker 4: 9:12

It was a safe, dim district and, like I said, it was only a few hundred votes between him and cisneros. Right, but them going down in there so yeah. So miss me with that bullshit.

Speaker 1: 9:25

Like she, I'm no, now the other the other issue is sometimes you have a you have a subset of left leaning, super left leaning, progressive candidates who exist solely to try to destroy the Democratic Party from within. And you know, look, I'm not approving Nancy Pelosi in any regard, at least not under these circumstances. But you definitely do have to safeguard your party and the reason why. Well, just look at the Republican Party. They didn't safeguard their party against demagoguery and incels and now look what happened they're about to destroy the planet. So you know, I just I do question Nancyosi's judgment in a lot of cases.

Speaker 4: 10:05

It's especially like I, I really do, like I don't know yeah, I mean so.

Speaker 1: 10:13

I I mean I've said it here a number of times like president biden, got to 81 million votes. He was a generational candidate because of the circumstances the country was facing and he met the moment and performed better than any other presidential candidate in the history of America. And a lot of elected officials looked at that and said, no, we want to lose again and, you know, committed to self-sabotage in that regard. But we also have a clip of Jon Stewart and his thoughts on the 2024 election.

Speaker 6: 10:48

Here's what we know is that we don't really know anything and that we're going to come out of this election and we're going to make all kind of pronouncements about what this country is and what this world is, and the truth is we're not really going to know shit and we're going to make it seem like this is the finality of our civilization and this and thing. We're all going to have to wake up tomorrow morning and work like hell to move the world to the place that we prefer it to be. And I just want to point out, just as a matter of perspective, that the lessons that our pundits take away from these results that they will pronounce with certainty will be wrong, and we have to remember that In 2008, when Barack Obama won, there's no question that this is the beginning, the first election of the future, really, and I think we are moving towards a post-racial America. Yeah, that lasted a day.

Speaker 7: 11:47

And then, of course, in 2012, obama won again and the lesson was the GOP needs to send a powerful signal to Hispanic voters that the party respects them.

Speaker 6: 12:01

That was the lesson they learned after that victory and they were certain of it and send a powerful signal to the Hispanic community. The GOP did.

Speaker 7: 12:13

When Mexico sends its people, they're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime, they're rapists.

Speaker 6: 12:20

Which apparently was the winning message and that taught Democrats in 2016 what.

Speaker 5: 12:27

Maybe what the Democrats will be looking for is somebody with some inside experience, but who's a generation younger.

Speaker 1: 12:32

It's obviously going to be younger, it's going to be from a new generation.

Speaker 6: 12:35

Need I say it?

Speaker 7: 12:37

It's a great honor and humility, I accept this nomination.

Speaker 6: 12:43

And that turned out to be a winning message again, which led to an insurrection, and the lesson from that was, when Donald Trump leaves office on Wednesday morning, he will leave Washington a pariah. Donald Trump will never be allowed to set foot in the Capitol again. Never Ever. My point is this, but this isn't the end.

Speaker 1: 13:14

I promise you, and we're going to stop him right there, because immediately upon his return to the Daily Show on Comedy Central, the first course of action for him was to do what destroy joe biden's chances of winning the 2024 election exactly.

Speaker 4: 13:32

Uh, yeah, that's why I'm like, yeah, so all motherfucking day on that bullshit yes, I mean yeah yeah, the one thing I can tell you about john stewart is he's probably right.

Speaker 1: 13:44

We'll all learn the wrong lessons from whatever happened in the 2024 election. He's probably absolutely correct about that. But in regards to his take on things, get that shit out of here. First episode, back. What was it? Joe Biden's old Great job guys. Way to sabotage yourself and then wonder why you lost. I mean him, along with a number of other individuals. The Pod, save America guys, the Bulwark, you know, medhi hassan, number of even supposedly left-leaning msnbc hosts spent a month destroying joe biden after the bait. And then what did we come to find out eventually, after kamala harris destroyed trump at their debate debates don't matter way to overre't matter, way to overreact to something totally mean.

Speaker 2: 14:34

People were happy with it. Well, people weren't happy with the old white man, but I wonder how he would have done. I mean, people kept saying he was going to lose too. They were certain Everything is bullshit. And I also share the part of the video where he screamed into the abyss, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 1: 14:51

Where he screamed into the abyss, yeah, yeah, where he said bleep that part.

Speaker 2: 14:58

Have you guys heard Bloody, bloody Andrew Jackson.

Speaker 1: 15:02

I have not heard that.

Speaker 2: 15:03

It's the prequel to Trump's second campaign? No, it's not, but it's a musical about. It's a musical about Andrew Jackson's campaign. Uh, bloody, bloody campaign.

Speaker 1: 15:16

Yeah, Fantastic, We'll have to. We'll have to save that for next week. Um, but yes, Ty, that's that's probably what our podcast is going to sound like for the foreseeable future Just a bunch of bleeps, just everything bleeped out. Maybe you'll get an and or the in there, like the bleepity bleep.

Speaker 2: 15:32

You usually beep us out.

Speaker 1: 15:34

No, I'm kidding, so it's just. I just, I am extraordinarily frustrated with the punditry here who are like how could this have happened? You know, how could Donald Trump have won, even though they spent four years normalizing all of the eight, well, eight years normalizing all of the Trump insanity.

Speaker 2: 15:51

It's like as soon as we find the guys who did this.

Speaker 1: 15:54

Yeah, it is the SpongeBob meme, with him in the police uniform staring at the wanted poster with the face of SpongeBob on it. So yeah, these people who contributed mightily to the demise of the United States are trying to figure out how it happened. After the fact, all you guys got to do out there is look in a fucking mirror. It is, it's not that difficult, just you know. Thanks, jon Stewart, for everything you've ever done. But in hindsight, looking back, on it.

Speaker 4: 16:25

So, in other words, thanks for nothing.

Speaker 1: 16:28

You took the words right out of my mouth.

Speaker 2: 16:31

You cheered us off after 9-11. John stewart was there okay.

Speaker 1: 16:38

Well, I guess in that regard I will give him the tiniest bit of praise for saying just attempting to console the nation from me after horrific disaster, um, but in terms of what this election means and having a trump, trump or trump administration the second time around, uh well, we've got a clip from donald trump himself on plans once he's first in office once in.

Speaker 7: 17:11

Here's my plan to dismantle the deep state and reclaim our democracy from Washington corruption Once and for all, and corruption it is. First, I will immediately reissue my 2020 executive order restoring the president's authority to remove rogue bureaucrats, and I will wield that power very aggressively. Second, we will clean out all of the corrupt actors in our national security and intelligence apparatus, and there are plenty of them. The departments and agencies that have been weaponized will be completely overhauled so that faceless bureaucrats will never again be able to target and persecute conservatives, christians or the left's political enemies, which they're doing now at a level that nobody can believe even possible. Third, we will totally reform FISA courts, which are so corrupt that the judges seemingly do not care when they are lied to in warrant applications. So many judges have seen so many applications that they know were wrong, or at least they must have known. They do nothing about it. They're lied to.

Speaker 7: 18:22

Fourth, to expose the hoaxes and abuses of power that have been tearing our country apart, we will establish a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to declassify and publish all documents on deep state spying, censorship and corruption and there are plenty of them. Fifth, we will launch a major crackdown on government leakers who collude with the fake news to deliberately weave false narratives and to subvert our government and our democracy. When possible, we will press criminal charges. Sixth, we will make every inspector general's office independent and physically separated from the departments they oversee, so they do not become the protectors of the deep state. Seventh, I will ask Congress to establish an independent auditing system to continually monitor our intelligence agencies to ensure they are not spying on our citizens or running disinformation campaigns against the American people, or that they are not spying on someone's campaign like they spied on my campaign. Eighth, we will continue the effort launched by the Trump administration to move parts of the sprawling federal bureaucracy to new locations outside the Washington swamp.

Speaker 1: 19:46

All right, so long story short. It's going to be really fucking bad guys. Now I know a lot of people listening to this, probably.

Speaker 2: 19:52

Was that music behind his speech? That eerie music?

Speaker 1: 19:55

Yes, it was extraordinarily disheartening hearing the music play behind it, or insanity. So I'm sure a lot of you listening are a lot more informed than, like that, the median voter on Trump's plans. But if you're not extraordinarily familiar, what you were hearing was a very accurate description of you guessed it Project 2025,. If you're not extraordinarily familiar, what you were hearing was a very accurate description of you guessed it project 2025. If you've read that and I know millions of people haven't read that, because there was apparently a spike in google searches on project 2025 immediately after the election, which indicates that millions of americans have no idea what the fuck they just voted for Yep.

Speaker 1: 20:33

So he's going to first of all, hollow out the federal government. A bunch of people are about to get fired, about to lose their jobs, people who just work in these agencies where they have a bit of expertise making sure that the government functions and the country functions as it's supposed to. The Department of Education that thing's probably gone. So you know, good luck making sure schools all across the country educate your kids. You want to get a student loan? You want to go to college? That's going to be extraordinarily difficult. Now we're going to have a bunch of red states diverting funds from public schools to private schools, private institutions. So your children are going to be less educated and your teachers are going to be underfunded. Oh, speaking of which, they're probably going to.

Speaker 2: 21:22

Scared. The teachers are going to be scared to teach anything. Because he's threatening to withhold funding from schools who teach lies against him.

Speaker 1: 21:30

Yeah, that's, that's something.

Speaker 2: 21:31

I heard previously on like a Fox interview. Which.

Speaker 4: 21:34

I am assuming is the truth.

Speaker 1: 21:37

That's entirely plausible. So you don't even know what kind of education your kids are going to be getting, because teachers are probably just going to teach absolutely nothing. Prageru Right. Yeah, we're going to get the PragerU education.

Speaker 4: 21:48

Trump University, prageru, making comebacks.

Speaker 1: 21:51

Yeah, so much for teachers getting raises. That's going out of the window. It's going to be all bad. Oh, it's so much for schools like ensuring that you know if you have a disabled student that they'll be able to access the school in any form fashion whatsoever.

Speaker 2: 22:05

And they just also said he's going to try to imprison any sources for journalists.

Speaker 1: 22:16

Yeah, look, there's a whole list of things, but I was just speaking specifically about the Department of Education there. So the intelligence agencies he's going to hollow those out and replace all of those people with Trump loyalists. Agencies are going to be used to now aid our allies or aid our enemies and disrupt the efforts of our allies, including likely spying on American citizens. So good luck with that. The Department of Justice that thing is going to no longer exist. So everyone that's hoping that if Trump does something outrageous and breaks the law, there'll be be another special counsel investigation, like there was in 2017. That's no longer a possibility. The FBI so if you're aware of those text messages that were being sent out in mass to numerous people across the United States suggesting that they've been drafted to be sent to a Trump plantation as slaves, the FBI is investigating that activity. Those investigations are going to cease to exist. The FBI is going to become an apparatus designed solely to protect Trump allies and prosecute his enemies. So so much for that.

Speaker 1: 23:27

Of course, got the armed forces. The military will be under his direct control. He's going to get rid of all of the generals, as he's previously said before. Hopefully, he won't execute them in ways that he alluded to when he was out of office. But you know, if he does sorry guys should have done more to stop him on January 6th. That was your fault and, of of course, they are currently having conversations about what to do. Should trump uh issue illegal orders asking them to attack united states citizens? And there were.

Speaker 5: 24:02

There was a conversation, I believe, on cnn, about that very matter well, I'm a little concerned, honestly, if the bureaucracy, whether it's in the Pentagon or any other agency, is already having discussions about how to countermand the commander in chief. I mean, let's remember how this works. He got elected president, he's the commander in chief, he gives the orders, they follow them, and so I don't like the idea candidly Wolf, of non-elected government people at any level having meetings with each other about how to thwart the duly elected president of the United States.

Speaker 1: 24:36

Now the military absolutely has to have these conversations because, as you might be well aware, there are previous instances of Trump ordering the military to shoot processors in 2020. So, obviously, he's issued illegal orders before he will do so again, and it's only, it's an only reasonable conclusion to draw that the military should be preparing for any kind of instances where Trump might try to illegally abuse his power as commander in chief in order the military to do things that they should not be doing. Of course, sadly, trump's not going to be held accountable in any way whatsoever because, as you heard, basically anyone in these federal agencies if they attempt to blow the whistle on such activities, he would use the powers of the federal government against them, including prosecutions. So we're likely not going to hear about bad things in the works until they actually happen and we see them play out in public. Sadly, but this is what a majority of Americans voted for.

Speaker 2: 25:41

Unless he keeps saying it out loud, like he always does and always has, that's also true. Yes, he does make very public proclamations about how much he probably had to practice that speech and how much they had to like amp him up on amphetamines. I mean to get him to deliver it.

Speaker 1: 26:00

I'm pretty sure they. They edited it in chunks and of course he had the teleprompter there. As you could see, he was clearly struggling to read everything off. But I, yeah, I mean I see, there's just there's.

Speaker 2: 26:11

The only confidence we have is in his incompetence and their incompetence. That's a problem with cronyism he is getting. He got rid of everyone who was worth anything intellectually left his campaign already and he's just getting a bunch of fucking sycophants and sycophants, whatever yeah, whatever.

Speaker 4: 26:29

Yeah, psych offense is good too.

Speaker 1: 26:31

I'll take that, I'll accept that we'll put that on the record. Psych offense as well, uh, but, and it's, and it's going to be worse than that, because he's not really the one making these personnel decisions. Um, those decisions have been outsourced to people in his campaign, specifically, you know well, elon musk but what happens when those people question him?

Speaker 2: 26:53

What happens when Elon Musk pisses him off? Do you think he still needs Elon Musk? Elon Musk got him elected.

Speaker 1: 26:59

I'm extraordinarily certain at this point that they are bound at the hip to each other for a couple of reasons, because Elon Musk in all likelihood committed numerous felonies in order to get trump elected, so he needs trump in office or at the very least, needs a republican in office to protect him yeah, but why does trump still need musk now that he's been elected? Uh, because I'm also just assuming that elon musk is aware of numerous criminal conspiracies that Trump's engaged in.

Speaker 2: 27:31

But nobody gives a shit anymore.

Speaker 1: 27:34

Well, this is the thing, right. So the reason I'm assuming, the reason why a lot of Republicans didn't turn on Trump after January 6th is because of their own involvement. Right, Like, it's one of those if you go down, we all go down together type of situations.

Speaker 1: 27:54

They're holding a gun at each other's head, not not literally speaking, but yeah, and you know, elon Musk is going to be making a lot of decisions about foreign policy and all of the positions in the federal government that affect the financial state of the United States. I mean just, it's going to be, it's going to be.

Speaker 2: 28:17

I can only hope they leave him in charge of gutting and gutting the agencies and staffing them just as well as he staffed Twitter.

Speaker 3: 28:24

And then you can see if their evil plans are carried out with the same effectiveness as Twitter continued to work.

Speaker 1: 28:32

Yeah, fingers crossed. Hopefully Elon Musk will be responsible for staffing these positions as well as he staffed his America PAC. That was apparently going around and not even knocking on doors and just filling out the forms afterwards.

Speaker 2: 28:45

He was just kidnapping them. Yes, those people were being trafficked in U-Hauls.

Speaker 1: 28:51

That was just the Black people Carol.

Speaker 1: 28:53

So I read that wasn't everyone, that was just the Black workers. He was trafficking them across state lines in vans with no seats. It was absolutely wild to see that play out and absolutely nothing be done about that. But now that trump's won the election unless something drastic happens where republicans end up not in control of the white house that's going to go uninvestigated and likely have no ramifications for elon musk whatsoever, unless some of these states do investigations and bring charges. But you know, fingers crossed, you can hope for that. I'm not entirely certain that that's likely, but it is a possibility. I don't know.

Speaker 4: 29:37

Be careful. I don't want them coming in like to kidnap and rape us you, because I know that your butthole is delicate. But Hi yes, what's up? No, somebody had just knocked on and sounded like somebody just knocked on the door and we're like whoa, we already got our orders.

Speaker 1: 29:59

Maybe it was one of those. Maybe it was one of those mythical illegal immigrants In Mexico. Yeah, they were probably American.

Speaker 4: 30:10

Oh, that's true.

Speaker 1: 30:12

They're fleeing the country, so that is a good point, right. But speaking of potential consequences of second Trump administration, I mean that conversation is going to be ongoing indefinitely. I know a lot of people out there over the course of the past year were concerned with the war that Israel was waging against Hamas and what it means for Palestinians. Well, we have something from Trump on that.

Speaker 7: 30:41

President, we will deport the foreign jihad sympathizers and we will deport them very quickly. And Hamas supporters will be gone. We will remove the jihadist sympathizers and Jew haters. We're going to remove the Jew haters who do nothing to help our country. They only want to destroy our country and we will never let the horrors of October 7th be repeated here on Americans. We will not let that happen. Unlike liberal Kamala, I will support Israel's right to win its war on terror. You have to support that Got to win, got to finish it all. And instead of pandering to the jihad sympathizers and America hating radicals, we will deport them. We will deport them very quickly.

Speaker 1: 31:31

Yeah, so for everyone who was calling.

Speaker 4: 31:33

He will sign for the win again.

Speaker 1: 31:35

For everyone who was calling President Biden genocide Joe, there you go, you got the candidate that you wanted in the White.

Speaker 4: 31:42

House. Thank you, Jill Stein, for all of your hard work.

Speaker 2: 31:44

Jill Stein didn't get millions. I mean that she did. She break the.

Speaker 1: 31:48

She got enough. She got about point. Five percent of the vote.

Speaker 2: 31:53

But, was there any where there are enough states that if she didn't exist and Harris had gotten all of what I did?

Speaker 4: 31:58

I looked at. I don't know if it was Arizona or Nevada, but the number of votes that she got and her and RFK Jr was like almost double what Harris.

Speaker 1: 32:13

Yeah, if you combine the third party vote in a couple of the swing states, it would be enough, yeah, to account for the margin between Harris and Trump. So kudos to you guys in that regard. You know Trump has said since winning the election that he would like Benjamin Netanyahu to finish the war before he even takes office, and in that regard he means wipe out Gaza. It's going to become a parking lot and after that I'm assuming Jared Kushner will be building beachfront property. And so much for the West Bank that's going to get annexed, sayonara. It's unfortunate, but you know this is what a majority of American citizens voted for.

Speaker 1: 32:52

If you're like super free Palestine out there, we try to tell you that like well, yes, we, we definitely care about the fate of the people in Palestine. It wasn't an issue that a number of Americans were super concerned with and in all likelihood, I'm sure a majority of white Americans are like hell, let's just nuke Gaza. I know it sucks to hear that. We were on your side and we tried to get you the candidate that would be most beneficial to the Palestinian cause. But unfortunately, here you are. You're stuck with Trump and the consequences are going to. I mean, it's going to be what it is.

Speaker 1: 33:30

And also, I would just like to point out that over the past six months or so, I've been seeing nonstop watermelon accounts just go viral day after day on Twitter. Non-stop watermelon accounts just go viral day after day on Twitter, just flooding my feed regularly in ways that was kind of unusual. And now, since Trump's won the election, absolute silence from those guys. So if you've got a watermelon in your account, that is no shade at you. You're an actual, real person and I believe that you support a cause. That is just and reasonable. But a lot of your allies disappeared and you probably got a wonder about that, what that actually means, that you've been investing your time and energy in, in, in what your movement was actually intended to do over the course of an election year. Just some food for thought there. I'm not pointing any fingers per se, just